What's most compelling to
me about the GMO Labeling Bill presented to the four counties: Oahu, Big Island ,
Kauai, and Maui , is not the bill itself but
the citizen effort behind the bill. I'm humbled and inspired by people like
Courtney Bruch who flew from Maui to Oahu
to testify for this bill on 12/7/11, as well as all the other people working
behind the scenes. Ramoda Prem Anand, a Maui citizen, authored the bill and
many people were involved in getting it successfully passed by the county
councils of Kauai, Maui and the Big
Island . I realized as I was writing this post, that I actually hadn't seen the bill itself, so after digging around, found the actual wording of GMO labeling bill item 11-339. You have to scroll down to page 13 or so - it's the third item in the package, after the traffic and housing bills. (Later on, I realized this link was in Oahu council member Tom Berg's email.)
Note: this blog post has been culled and sifted from multiple online sources, and I have tried to include links to those sources.
Goal: The plan was to bring the GMO labeling resolution, item 11-339, to all four counties to vote on whether to approve this bill for inclusion in the Hawaii State Association of Counties (HSAC) package of bills which would go straight to the state legislature in January.
Results so far:
Maui County voted in support of the GMO
labeling bill in October.
Kauai County voted in support of the GMO
labeling bill on December 1st.
On December 7th, the Big Island, Hawaii County also voted in support of this GMO bill for inclusion in the HSAC package.
On December 7th, the Honolulu City Council (the council for all of Oahu) voted to keep the GMO labeling bill out of the HSAC package, after a bit of drama.
Outcome and next steps:
The next plan is to introduce the GMO labeling bill directly to the state legislature. So more testimony, phone calls and emails will be asked for, probably in the next few weeks!
SO… what happened onOahu ?
On November 15th, the members of the Safety, Economic Development and Government Affairs Committee proposed and unanimously passed an amendment to remove item 11-339, the GMO labeling resolution, from the HSAC package of bills. From reading various online commentaries, it appears that Stanley Chang authored the 11/15 floor draft to remove the GMO labeling bill from the HSAC package, and that Nestor Garcia was the council member who introduced Chang’s floor draft.
The five members of the Oahu Council’s Safety, Economic Development and Government Affairs Committee are (confirmed by the Honolulu City Council website):
Tulsi Gabbard Tamayo Chair
Tom Berg Vice-chair
Stanley Chang
Breen Harimoto
Nestor Garcia
These five members did NOT represent the entire council, and their action compromised the efforts in the other counties. What allows five members of a nine–member council on one island to cast aside a bill that has been receiving support from the rest of the state?
As of 11/15/11,Hawaii County
had not voted on this bill, but on December 7th, they also voted in
favor of it.
A few notes about the members of this committee:
As chair of the committee, Tulsi Gabbard was also active in removing the GMO labeling bill, which other online commentators find ironic since her father Sen. Mike Gabbard is a vegetarian, ran a health food store in the 80s, and has actively campaigned for a GMO labeling bill.
How the Council could have reinstated the bill back into the HSAC package:
To bring back the GMO bill to the HSAC package required a member to propose a floor draft. Council member Tom Berg, part of the original committee which voted down the bill, proposed a floor draft to reinstate the bill but needed a second council member to support it. His floor draft was apparently not the same as the original proposal, since he asked for GMO labeling through mandatory signage in stores, as opposed to labeling of food items.
My limited involvement with this issue so far:
When I got the email from Courtney Bruch in late November, my first reaction was to shut down. The issue seemed overwhelming and I couldn't/didn't feel up to making any phone calls or email testimony. A few days later, I re-read her email and realized the hearing was in a couple of days. So, I set my timer for 15 minutes and made phone calls to the nine council members on Oahu. I got more voicemail machines than actual people. In no instance did I talk with an actual council member, only their aides. The task took all of about 15 minutes. Then I wrote a very short email and sent it to all the council members. This also took just a few minutes.
The next day, I called my mother on Oahu and gave her all the phone numbers, names, and asked her to call and bother them. She has more free time than I do. I also talked with two friends on Oahu. They are politically aware and active, but didn't know anything about this bill. They promised to make phone calls and send emails. This second part took more time but was a great way to re-connect with people.
The issue initially seems daunting, but the bill itself is very short, only four or five pages. The amount of work that other citizens have done is tremendous, and I'm amazed they have gotten this far. My next task was to synthesize the information about the bill and the political action so far. I've been avoiding doing this post for weeks because there is SO much information and I've been wanting an overview, but I think it's really important.
My advice to everyone else - read a little bit, stop, absorb it, and then do a little more. No need to tackle it all at once. A lot of people have already done the dirty work. Then speak up - make your phone calls or send your emails. If you don't think you have the time, just set a timer for a few minutes and make one email. Don't let it overwhelm you. Be inspired by how far this bill has gotten. Also, I'm recalling what someone else said last fall - there are many ways to "occupy" a system - one can "occupy" phone lines by making so many phone calls, it overwhelms a business.
Happy New Year! Don't be daunted. Be inspired!
A few video resources:
Maui county policy committee on 9/14/11 on the GMO labeling bill:
·
Stanley Chang
Note: this blog post has been culled and sifted from multiple online sources, and I have tried to include links to those sources.
Goal: The plan was to bring the GMO labeling resolution, item 11-339, to all four counties to vote on whether to approve this bill for inclusion in the Hawaii State Association of Counties (HSAC) package of bills which would go straight to the state legislature in January.
Results so far:
On December 7th, the Big Island, Hawaii County also voted in support of this GMO bill for inclusion in the HSAC package.
On December 7th, the Honolulu City Council (the council for all of Oahu) voted to keep the GMO labeling bill out of the HSAC package, after a bit of drama.
Outcome and next steps:
The next plan is to introduce the GMO labeling bill directly to the state legislature. So more testimony, phone calls and emails will be asked for, probably in the next few weeks!
SO… what happened on
On November 15th, the members of the Safety, Economic Development and Government Affairs Committee proposed and unanimously passed an amendment to remove item 11-339, the GMO labeling resolution, from the HSAC package of bills. From reading various online commentaries, it appears that Stanley Chang authored the 11/15 floor draft to remove the GMO labeling bill from the HSAC package, and that Nestor Garcia was the council member who introduced Chang’s floor draft.
The five members of the Oahu Council’s Safety, Economic Development and Government Affairs Committee are (confirmed by the Honolulu City Council website):
Tulsi Gabbard Tamayo Chair
Tom Berg Vice-chair
Breen Harimoto
Nestor Garcia
These five members did NOT represent the entire council, and their action compromised the efforts in the other counties. What allows five members of a nine–member council on one island to cast aside a bill that has been receiving support from the rest of the state?
As of 11/15/11,
A few notes about the members of this committee:
Nestor Garcia was the one who proposed the amendment to remove the
bill. His district includes the Kunia agricultural area (Monsanto, Syngenta , Hawaii
Crop Improvement Association).
As chair of the committee, Tulsi Gabbard was also active in removing the GMO labeling bill, which other online commentators find ironic since her father Sen. Mike Gabbard is a vegetarian, ran a health food store in the 80s, and has actively campaigned for a GMO labeling bill.
Council
member Tom Berg is a Tea Party conservative who won with a small voter turnout.
How the Council could have reinstated the bill back into the HSAC package:
To bring back the GMO bill to the HSAC package required a member to propose a floor draft. Council member Tom Berg, part of the original committee which voted down the bill, proposed a floor draft to reinstate the bill but needed a second council member to support it. His floor draft was apparently not the same as the original proposal, since he asked for GMO labeling through mandatory signage in stores, as opposed to labeling of food items.
The council apparently only began to hear testimony at 4 pm, and no second council member supported Berg’s floor draft, Resolution 11-339, CD1, Proposed FD1 (TB). Source:http://www.hawaiipoliticalinfo.org/node/4702
Another approach is that the council could have
Despite a flurry of testimony prior to the meeting through phone calls and emails, the council voted to support Stanley Chang’s original floor draft which had the GMO labeling clause removed, Resolution 11-339, CD1, Proposed FD1 (SC). In short, 8 council members voted to keep the GMO labeling clause out of the HSAC package with only Tom Berg voting against it.
Both floor drafts were listed under Resolution 11-339 CD1, in the CR-347.
Reports from the Hearing:
At the hearing on December 7th, the biotech interests were well-represented according to observers. Many biotech people testified towards the end of the hearing. One notable lobbyist was Alicia Maluafiti, who observers say is originally from the mainland but has a local last name from a former marriage. As Executive Director of the Hawaii Crop Improvement Association, she said she didn't want the cost of food to rise because of labeling requirements. One blogger “says the 990 tax form for the Association lists her compensation as $90,000 in 2010 for a 30 hr week (although this might be prorated throughout the year). She also lobbies for 2 other groups, a GMO fish corp, and an energy company.” Other commentators noted her “fake pidgin accent.”
For more commentary on the hearing: http://dougnote.blogspot.com/2011/12/let-people-speak-label-gmos-hearing.html#!/2011/12/let-people-speak-label-gmos-hearing.html
http://www.hawaiipoliticalinfo.org/node/4702
My limited involvement with this issue so far:
When I got the email from Courtney Bruch in late November, my first reaction was to shut down. The issue seemed overwhelming and I couldn't/didn't feel up to making any phone calls or email testimony. A few days later, I re-read her email and realized the hearing was in a couple of days. So, I set my timer for 15 minutes and made phone calls to the nine council members on Oahu. I got more voicemail machines than actual people. In no instance did I talk with an actual council member, only their aides. The task took all of about 15 minutes. Then I wrote a very short email and sent it to all the council members. This also took just a few minutes.
The next day, I called my mother on Oahu and gave her all the phone numbers, names, and asked her to call and bother them. She has more free time than I do. I also talked with two friends on Oahu. They are politically aware and active, but didn't know anything about this bill. They promised to make phone calls and send emails. This second part took more time but was a great way to re-connect with people.
The issue initially seems daunting, but the bill itself is very short, only four or five pages. The amount of work that other citizens have done is tremendous, and I'm amazed they have gotten this far. My next task was to synthesize the information about the bill and the political action so far. I've been avoiding doing this post for weeks because there is SO much information and I've been wanting an overview, but I think it's really important.
My advice to everyone else - read a little bit, stop, absorb it, and then do a little more. No need to tackle it all at once. A lot of people have already done the dirty work. Then speak up - make your phone calls or send your emails. If you don't think you have the time, just set a timer for a few minutes and make one email. Don't let it overwhelm you. Be inspired by how far this bill has gotten. Also, I'm recalling what someone else said last fall - there are many ways to "occupy" a system - one can "occupy" phone lines by making so many phone calls, it overwhelms a business.
Happy New Year! Don't be daunted. Be inspired!
A few video resources:
This is tremendously time consuming to take a 2 1/2 hour video and then post it to youtube. I'm very thankful someone else did this.
Documentary: The World According to Monsanto.
Documentary: The World According to Monsanto.
Appendix
1:
Resources,
blog posts and commentary on the GMO labeling effort:
Hawaii
County GMO Food Labeling Bill http://mauifeed.com/county-of-maui/maui-hawaii-resurrect-gmo-food-labeling-bill/
·
The
Actual text of GMO bill 11-339
http://www4.honolulu.gov/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-118900/6g5mn_rb.pdf - scroll down to page 13.
The actual voting on December 7th re: the various floor drafts:
"Hawaii
has more experimental field trials of genetic engineering THAN ANY OTHER STATE
IN THE NATION.
Just a few of the many examples of permits granted for field trials include:
*Corn engineered with human genes (Dow)
*Sugarcane engineered with human genes (Hawai‘i Agriculture Research Center)
*Corn engineered with jellyfish genes (Stanford University)
... *Tobacco engineered with lettuce genes (University of Hawai‘i)
*Rice engineered with human genes (Applied Phytologics)
*Corn engineered with hepatitis virus genes (Prodigene)1"
Just a few of the many examples of permits granted for field trials include:
*Corn engineered with human genes (Dow)
*Sugarcane engineered with human genes (Hawai‘i Agriculture Research Center)
*Corn engineered with jellyfish genes (Stanford University)
... *Tobacco engineered with lettuce genes (University of Hawai‘i)
*Rice engineered with human genes (Applied Phytologics)
*Corn engineered with hepatitis virus genes (Prodigene)1"
(From
hawaiiseed.org as posted on various Facebook pages.)
Appendix 2:
List of
Honolulu City Council Members as of December 7th, 2011 meeting
(provided by Courtney Bruch):
Tom Berg
Phone:
(808) 768-5001
tberg@honolulu.gov
Ernest Y.
Martin
Phone:
(808) 768-5002
emartin@honolulu.gov
Ikaika
Anderson
Phone:
(808) 768-5003
ianderson@honolulu.gov
Phone:
(808) 768-5004
ccldistrict4@honolulu.gov
Ann
Kobayashi
Phone:
(808) 768-5005
akobayashi@honolulu.gov
Tulsi
Gabbard
Phone:
(808) 768-5006
tgabbard@honolulu.gov
Romy M.
Cachola
Phone:
(808) 768-5007
rcachola@honolulu.gov
Breene
Harimoto
Phone: (808)
768-5008
bharimoto@honolulu.gov
Nestor R.
Garcia
Phone:
(808) 768-5009
ngarcia@honolulu.gov
Group
email list:
tberg@honolulu.gov,emartin@honolulu.gov,ianderson@honolulu.gov,ccldistrict4@honolulu.gov,akobayashi@honolulu.gov,tgabbard@honolulu.gov,rcachola@honolulu.gov,rcachola@honolulu.gov,bharimoto@honolulu.gov,ngarcia@honolulu.gov
Appendix 3:
Courtney
Bruch’s letter after the December 7th hearing to
Appendix
4:
Appendix
5:
Email
from Tom Berg
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 5:45 PM
Subject: Councilman Tom Berg Floor amendment to insert a GMO bill into Reso. 11-339 CD1
Aloha Friends,
Thank you very much for writing to me about your concerns regarding the need to
distinguish or identify for the consumer GMO from Non-GMO produce/products.
Please be sure to submit your testimony to VChung@honolulu.gov<mailto:VChung@honolulu.gov> see below for instructions.
I am offering a floor amendment at the full Council meeting on Wednesday,
December 7, 2011 AM to to insert a GMO resolution into the HSAC package.
Please see COUNCIL AGENDA.<http://www4.honolulu.gov/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-119359/120711%20Council%20Agenda.htm> Please see TOM BERG FD1<http://www4.honolulu.gov/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-119388/RES11-339,%20CD1,%20PROPOSED%20FD1%20(TB).pdf>.
I do believe that this important issue must be addressed and we are searching for
a method to accomplish this goal. The State Legislature tackled frozen bread versus
"fresh" recently and that type of labeling issue--- and they came up with a compromise
for starters that provides for signage instead to identify frozen bread sold next to authentic "fresh bread."
Someone will need to second my motion, if not, and then the proposal for signage is moot that day. It may be that other members would entertain it at another time but I am going forward with this so that at least we continue the discussions.
Thank you for your input on this issue.
Mahalo,
Tom Berg
City Council of Honolulu
www.councilmanberg.com
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
16TH SESSION
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2011 - 10 A.M.
SPEAKER REGISTRATION
Persons wishing to testify on items listed on the morning calendar are requested to register by 10 a.m. in the interest of time management as follows:
a. use the On‑Line City Council Speaker Registration form available at http://www.honolulu.gov/council/attnspkccl.htm;
b. send a fax to 768-3826 indicating your desire to register to speak, along with your name, phone number and subject matter;
c. fill out the registration form in person; or
d. call 768-3813.
On-line and fax registration forms must be received by 10 a.m. to be included in the list of registered speakers. Persons who have not registered to testify by 10 a.m. will be given an opportunity to present oral testimony on an item following the registered speakers by raising their hand at the time additional speakers are called upon.
Each speaker shall not have anyone else read their statement and is limited to:
a. three-minute presentation on New Business and Sunshined items;
b. one-minute presentation on all other items.
WRITTEN TESTIMONY
If you wish to submit written testimony:
a. fax to 768-3826 or
b. go to http://www.honolulu.gov/council/emailccl.htm to e‑mail your written testimony.
By submitting written testimony, you are not automatically registered to speak. Refer to “SPEAKER REGISTRATION” procedures above.
If submitted, written testimonies, including the testifier’s address, e-mail address and phone number, may be posted by the City Clerk and available to the public on the City’s DocuShare Website.
Any physically challenged person requiring special assistance should call 768-3813 for details at least one day prior to the meeting date.
Honorary Certificates will be presented at 9 a.m.
Subject: Councilman Tom Berg Floor amendment to insert a GMO bill into Reso. 11-339 CD1
Aloha Friends,
Thank you very much for writing to me about your concerns regarding the need to
distinguish or identify for the consumer GMO from Non-GMO produce/products.
Please be sure to submit your testimony to VChung@honolulu.gov<mailto:VChung@honolulu.gov> see below for instructions.
I am offering a floor amendment at the full Council meeting on Wednesday,
December 7, 2011 AM to to insert a GMO resolution into the HSAC package.
Please see COUNCIL AGENDA.<http://www4.honolulu.gov/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-119359/120711%20Council%20Agenda.htm> Please see TOM BERG FD1<http://www4.honolulu.gov/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-119388/RES11-339,%20CD1,%20PROPOSED%20FD1%20(TB).pdf>.
I do believe that this important issue must be addressed and we are searching for
a method to accomplish this goal. The State Legislature tackled frozen bread versus
"fresh" recently and that type of labeling issue--- and they came up with a compromise
for starters that provides for signage instead to identify frozen bread sold next to authentic "fresh bread."
Someone will need to second my motion, if not, and then the proposal for signage is moot that day. It may be that other members would entertain it at another time but I am going forward with this so that at least we continue the discussions.
Thank you for your input on this issue.
Mahalo,
www.councilmanberg.com
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
16TH SESSION
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2011 - 10 A.M.
SPEAKER REGISTRATION
Persons wishing to testify on items listed on the morning calendar are requested to register by 10 a.m. in the interest of time management as follows:
a. use the On‑Line City Council Speaker Registration form available at http://www.honolulu.gov/council/attnspkccl.htm;
b. send a fax to 768-3826 indicating your desire to register to speak, along with your name, phone number and subject matter;
c. fill out the registration form in person; or
d. call 768-3813.
On-line and fax registration forms must be received by 10 a.m. to be included in the list of registered speakers. Persons who have not registered to testify by 10 a.m. will be given an opportunity to present oral testimony on an item following the registered speakers by raising their hand at the time additional speakers are called upon.
Each speaker shall not have anyone else read their statement and is limited to:
a. three-minute presentation on New Business and Sunshined items;
b. one-minute presentation on all other items.
WRITTEN TESTIMONY
If you wish to submit written testimony:
a. fax to 768-3826 or
b. go to http://www.honolulu.gov/council/emailccl.htm to e‑mail your written testimony.
By submitting written testimony, you are not automatically registered to speak. Refer to “SPEAKER REGISTRATION” procedures above.
If submitted, written testimonies, including the testifier’s address, e-mail address and phone number, may be posted by the City Clerk and available to the public on the City’s DocuShare Website.
Any physically challenged person requiring special assistance should call 768-3813 for details at least one day prior to the meeting date.
Honorary Certificates will be presented at 9 a.m.
Hey Courtney! Came over from the facebook group. Wow. I'm so inspired by the work that so many have done and by you for putting this post together! It motivates me to become more involved in the Democratic process.
ReplyDeleteHey, thanks for posting! It felt overwhelming when I first tried to write about this, but I wanted to make it simpler for other people who are just learning about it.
ReplyDeleteA lot to learn on this post. Thank you for taking the time to write this down. WIll re-read it in depth later, but for now just want to say I appreciate your passion for your cause.
ReplyDeleteLabeling is fine, but the world would already starve without GMOs. My daughter is a scientist, I've been to her lab at Stanford, and I believe our worst diseases and world problems are going to be solved by the amazing human ingenuity that is unlocking the potential that is within each person and plant's genetic code. We cannot turn back the hands of time, nor should we want to. I worry that issues like this are misinterpreted by people who don't take the time to really be informed, and then have knee-jerk panic responses. In that spirit, I'm in support of labeling- information is power. I'm also in favor of responsible science and GMOs.
ReplyDeleteAloha
Toby
@ Toby, I'm not against genetics or science, but think that people have a right to know what's in their food. I don't want to turn back time either. No one wants anyone to starve. Dr. Lorrin Pang is one of the most amazing, educated speakers on GMO issues, and lives here on Maui. If you read his bio, it's pretty astounding, and he is retired from his internationally acclaimed scientific career to serve as Maui's public health officer. I agree with him, in that it's one thing in a lab, but another thing out in the open. Thx for your input!
ReplyDelete